finc.format ElectronicArticle
finc.mega_collection sid-55-col-jstorlife
sid-55-col-jstorhealth
JSTOR Life Sciences Archive
JSTOR Health & General Sciences
finc.id ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS80MDQ4NTAxNA
finc.source_id 55
ris.type EJOUR
rft.atitle The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology
rft.epage 16033
rft.genre article
rft.issn 0027-8424
rft.issue 38
rft.jtitle Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
rft.tpages 5
rft.pages 16028-16033
rft.pub National Academy of Sciences
rft.date 2009-09-22
x.date 2009-09-22T00:00:00Z
rft.spage 16028
rft.volume 106
abstract <p>A procedure is outlined for distinguishing among competing hypotheses for fossil morphology and then used to evaluate current views on the meaning of Neandertal skeletal morphology. Three explanations have dominated debates about the meaning of Neandertal cranial features: climatic adaptation, anterior dental loading, and genetic drift. Neither climatic adaptation nor anterior dental loading are well supported, but genetic drift is consistent with the available evidence. Climatic adaptation and activity patterns are the most discussed explanations for Neandertal postcranial features. Robust empirical relationships between climate and body form in extant humans and other endotherms currently make climatic adaptation the most plausible explanation for the wide bodies and relatively short limbs of Neandertals, and many additional postcranial features are likely secondary consequences of these overall skeletal proportions. Activity patterns may explain certain Neandertal postcranial features, but unlike the situation for climate, relationships in extant humans between morphology and activities are typically not well established. For both the cranium and the postcranium, changes in diet or activity patterns may underlie why Neandertals and Pleistocene modern humans tend to be more robust than Holocene humans.</p>
authors Array ( [rft.aulast] => Weaver [rft.aufirst] => Timothy D. )
Array ( [rft.aulast] => Klein [rft.aufirst] => Richard G. )
languages eng
url https://www.jstor.org/stable/40485014
version 0.9
x.subjects Out of Africa: Modern Human Origins Special Feature
x.oa 1
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=The+Meaning+of+Neandertal+Skeletal+Morphology&rft.date=2009-09-22&genre=article&issn=0027-8424&volume=106&issue=38&spage=16028&epage=16033&pages=16028-16033&jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences+of+the+United+States+of+America&atitle=The+Meaning+of+Neandertal+Skeletal+Morphology&aulast=Klein&aufirst=Richard+G.&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1778941845997355011
author Weaver, Timothy D., Klein, Richard G.
author_facet Weaver, Timothy D., Klein, Richard G., Weaver, Timothy D., Klein, Richard G.
author_sort weaver, timothy d.
collection sid-55-col-jstorlife, sid-55-col-jstorhealth
container_issue 38
container_start_page 16028
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
container_volume 106
description <p>A procedure is outlined for distinguishing among competing hypotheses for fossil morphology and then used to evaluate current views on the meaning of Neandertal skeletal morphology. Three explanations have dominated debates about the meaning of Neandertal cranial features: climatic adaptation, anterior dental loading, and genetic drift. Neither climatic adaptation nor anterior dental loading are well supported, but genetic drift is consistent with the available evidence. Climatic adaptation and activity patterns are the most discussed explanations for Neandertal postcranial features. Robust empirical relationships between climate and body form in extant humans and other endotherms currently make climatic adaptation the most plausible explanation for the wide bodies and relatively short limbs of Neandertals, and many additional postcranial features are likely secondary consequences of these overall skeletal proportions. Activity patterns may explain certain Neandertal postcranial features, but unlike the situation for climate, relationships in extant humans between morphology and activities are typically not well established. For both the cranium and the postcranium, changes in diet or activity patterns may underlie why Neandertals and Pleistocene modern humans tend to be more robust than Holocene humans.</p>
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS80MDQ4NTAxNA
imprint National Academy of Sciences, 2009
imprint_str_mv National Academy of Sciences, 2009
institution DE-D13, DE-15, DE-14
issn 0027-8424
issn_str_mv 0027-8424
language English
last_indexed 2023-10-05T18:39:07.592Z
match_str weaver:2009:themeaningofneandertalskeletalmorphology:
mega_collection JSTOR Life Sciences Archive, JSTOR Health & General Sciences
physical 16028-16033
publishDate 2009
publishDateSort 2009
publisher National Academy of Sciences
recordtype ai
score 18,822563
series Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
source_id 55
spelling Weaver, Timothy D. Klein, Richard G. 0027-8424 National Academy of Sciences Out of Africa: Modern Human Origins Special Feature https://www.jstor.org/stable/40485014 <p>A procedure is outlined for distinguishing among competing hypotheses for fossil morphology and then used to evaluate current views on the meaning of Neandertal skeletal morphology. Three explanations have dominated debates about the meaning of Neandertal cranial features: climatic adaptation, anterior dental loading, and genetic drift. Neither climatic adaptation nor anterior dental loading are well supported, but genetic drift is consistent with the available evidence. Climatic adaptation and activity patterns are the most discussed explanations for Neandertal postcranial features. Robust empirical relationships between climate and body form in extant humans and other endotherms currently make climatic adaptation the most plausible explanation for the wide bodies and relatively short limbs of Neandertals, and many additional postcranial features are likely secondary consequences of these overall skeletal proportions. Activity patterns may explain certain Neandertal postcranial features, but unlike the situation for climate, relationships in extant humans between morphology and activities are typically not well established. For both the cranium and the postcranium, changes in diet or activity patterns may underlie why Neandertals and Pleistocene modern humans tend to be more robust than Holocene humans.</p> The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
spellingShingle Weaver, Timothy D., Klein, Richard G., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology, Out of Africa: Modern Human Origins Special Feature
title The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology
title_full The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology
title_fullStr The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology
title_full_unstemmed The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology
title_short The Meaning of Neandertal Skeletal Morphology
title_sort the meaning of neandertal skeletal morphology
topic Out of Africa: Modern Human Origins Special Feature
url https://www.jstor.org/stable/40485014