Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Might God Not Have Been God?
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Religious Studies |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Religious Studies, 31, 1995, 4, S. 421-427 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge University Press
|
| finc.format |
ElectronicArticle |
|---|---|
| finc.mega_collection |
sid-55-col-jstorreligion sid-55-col-jstoras5 JSTOR Religion & Theology JSTOR Arts & Sciences V Archive |
| finc.id |
ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yMDAxOTc3MQ |
| finc.source_id |
55 |
| ris.type |
EJOUR |
| rft.atitle |
Might God Not Have Been God? |
| rft.epage |
427 |
| rft.genre |
article |
| rft.issn |
0034-4125 1469-901X |
| rft.issue |
4 |
| rft.jtitle |
Religious Studies |
| rft.tpages |
6 |
| rft.pages |
421-427 |
| rft.pub |
Cambridge University Press |
| rft.date |
1995-12-01 |
| x.date |
1995-12-01T00:00:00Z |
| rft.spage |
421 |
| rft.volume |
31 |
| abstract |
<p>James Sennett has argued that Yahweh may possess the properties of divinity contingently; that it is an open question whether Yahweh is divine in all possible worlds, and that perfect goodness cannot belong essentially to anyone. In response to Sennett it is here argued that it does not make clear sense to suppose that properties apply to Yahweh contingently, and that Sennett fails to demonstrate that perfect goodness cannot apply essentially. There are problems with the notion of perfect goodness, but these would tend to suggest that the notion lacks application anywhere.</p> |
| authors |
Array
(
[rft.aulast] => Shaw
[rft.aufirst] => Patrick
)
|
| languages |
eng |
| url |
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20019771 |
| version |
0.9 |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Might+God+Not+Have+Been+God%3F&rft.date=1995-12-01&genre=article&issn=1469-901X&volume=31&issue=4&spage=421&epage=427&pages=421-427&jtitle=Religious+Studies&atitle=Might+God+Not+Have+Been+God%3F&aulast=Shaw&aufirst=Patrick&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792366207111790601 |
| author | Shaw, Patrick |
| author_facet | Shaw, Patrick, Shaw, Patrick |
| author_sort | shaw, patrick |
| collection | sid-55-col-jstorreligion, sid-55-col-jstoras5 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 421 |
| container_title | Religious Studies |
| container_volume | 31 |
| description | <p>James Sennett has argued that Yahweh may possess the properties of divinity contingently; that it is an open question whether Yahweh is divine in all possible worlds, and that perfect goodness cannot belong essentially to anyone. In response to Sennett it is here argued that it does not make clear sense to suppose that properties apply to Yahweh contingently, and that Sennett fails to demonstrate that perfect goodness cannot apply essentially. There are problems with the notion of perfect goodness, but these would tend to suggest that the notion lacks application anywhere.</p> |
| facet_avail | Online |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yMDAxOTc3MQ |
| imprint | Cambridge University Press, 1995 |
| imprint_str_mv | Cambridge University Press, 1995 |
| institution | DE-540, DE-D13, DE-15 |
| issn | 0034-4125, 1469-901X |
| issn_str_mv | 0034-4125, 1469-901X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T22:53:16.757Z |
| match_str | shaw1995mightgodnothavebeengod |
| mega_collection | JSTOR Religion & Theology, JSTOR Arts & Sciences V Archive |
| physical | 421-427 |
| publishDate | 1995 |
| publishDateSort | 1995 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| score | 18,458569 |
| series | Religious Studies |
| source_id | 55 |
| spelling | Shaw, Patrick 0034-4125 1469-901X Cambridge University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/20019771 <p>James Sennett has argued that Yahweh may possess the properties of divinity contingently; that it is an open question whether Yahweh is divine in all possible worlds, and that perfect goodness cannot belong essentially to anyone. In response to Sennett it is here argued that it does not make clear sense to suppose that properties apply to Yahweh contingently, and that Sennett fails to demonstrate that perfect goodness cannot apply essentially. There are problems with the notion of perfect goodness, but these would tend to suggest that the notion lacks application anywhere.</p> Might God Not Have Been God? Religious Studies |
| spellingShingle | Shaw, Patrick, Religious Studies, Might God Not Have Been God? |
| title | Might God Not Have Been God? |
| title_full | Might God Not Have Been God? |
| title_fullStr | Might God Not Have Been God? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Might God Not Have Been God? |
| title_short | Might God Not Have Been God? |
| title_sort | might god not have been god? |
| title_unstemmed | Might God Not Have Been God? |
| url | https://www.jstor.org/stable/20019771 |