Eintrag weiter verarbeiten
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
Gespeichert in:
| Zeitschriftentitel: | Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
|---|---|
| Personen und Körperschaften: | |
| In: | Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 46, 2021, 2, S. 106-125 |
| Format: | E-Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| veröffentlicht: |
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
|
| Schlagwörter: |
| author_facet |
Langenohl, Andreas Langenohl, Andreas |
|---|---|
| author |
Langenohl, Andreas |
| spellingShingle |
Langenohl, Andreas Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded |
| author_sort |
langenohl, andreas |
| spelling |
Langenohl, Andreas 0172-6404 GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974 <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p> Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
| facet_avail |
Online Free |
| format |
ElectronicArticle |
| fullrecord |
blob:ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yNzAzMjk3NA |
| id |
ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yNzAzMjk3NA |
| institution |
DE-15 DE-D13 |
| imprint |
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021 |
| imprint_str_mv |
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021 |
| issn |
0172-6404 |
| issn_str_mv |
0172-6404 |
| language |
English |
| mega_collection |
JSTOR Arts & Sciences X Archive |
| match_str |
langenohl2021algorithmicreflexivitytheconstitutionofsociotechnicalaccountabilityinfinancialpricing |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| publisher |
GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences |
| recordtype |
ai |
| record_format |
ai |
| series |
Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
| source_id |
55 |
| title |
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_unstemmed |
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_full |
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_fullStr |
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_short |
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_sort |
algorithmic reflexivity : the constitution of socio-technical accountability in financial pricing |
| topic |
Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded |
| url |
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| physical |
106-125 |
| description |
<p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p> |
| collection |
sid-55-col-jstoras10 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| container_start_page |
106 |
| container_title |
Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
| container_volume |
46 |
| format_de105 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 |
E-Article |
| format_del152 |
Buch |
| format_del189 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 |
Article |
| format_dezwi2 |
Article, E-Article |
| format_finc |
Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw |
Article, E-Article |
| _version_ |
1792362937750388736 |
| geogr_code |
not assigned |
| last_indexed |
2024-03-01T22:01:38.178Z |
| geogr_code_person |
not assigned |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Algorithmic+Reflexivity+%3A+The+Constitution+of+Socio-Technical+Accountability+in+Financial+Pricing&rft.date=2021-01-01&genre=article&issn=0172-6404&volume=46&issue=2&spage=106&epage=125&pages=106-125&jtitle=Historical+Social+Research+%2F+Historische+Sozialforschung&atitle=Algorithmic+Reflexivity+%3A+The+Constitution+of+Socio-Technical+Accountability+in+Financial+Pricing&aulast=Langenohl&aufirst=Andreas&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1792362937750388736 |
| author | Langenohl, Andreas |
| author_facet | Langenohl, Andreas, Langenohl, Andreas |
| author_sort | langenohl, andreas |
| collection | sid-55-col-jstoras10 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 106 |
| container_title | Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
| container_volume | 46 |
| description | <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p> |
| facet_avail | Online, Free |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yNzAzMjk3NA |
| imprint | GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021 |
| imprint_str_mv | GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-D13 |
| issn | 0172-6404 |
| issn_str_mv | 0172-6404 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-01T22:01:38.178Z |
| match_str | langenohl2021algorithmicreflexivitytheconstitutionofsociotechnicalaccountabilityinfinancialpricing |
| mega_collection | JSTOR Arts & Sciences X Archive |
| physical | 106-125 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences |
| record_format | ai |
| recordtype | ai |
| series | Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
| source_id | 55 |
| spelling | Langenohl, Andreas 0172-6404 GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974 <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p> Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung |
| spellingShingle | Langenohl, Andreas, Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing, Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded |
| title | Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_full | Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_fullStr | Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_full_unstemmed | Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_short | Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| title_sort | algorithmic reflexivity : the constitution of socio-technical accountability in financial pricing |
| title_unstemmed | Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing |
| topic | Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded |
| url | https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974 |