author_facet Langenohl, Andreas
Langenohl, Andreas
author Langenohl, Andreas
spellingShingle Langenohl, Andreas
Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded
author_sort langenohl, andreas
spelling Langenohl, Andreas 0172-6404 GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974 <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p> Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
facet_avail Online
Free
format ElectronicArticle
fullrecord {"finc.format":"ElectronicArticle","finc.mega_collection":["sid-55-col-jstoras10","JSTOR Arts \u0026 Sciences X Archive"],"finc.id":"ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yNzAzMjk3NA","finc.source_id":"55","ris.type":"EJOUR","rft.atitle":"Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing","rft.epage":"125","rft.genre":"article","rft.issn":["0172-6404"],"rft.issue":"2","rft.jtitle":"Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung","rft.tpages":"19","rft.pages":"106-125","rft.pub":["GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences"],"rft.date":"2021-01-01","x.date":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","rft.spage":"106","rft.volume":"46","abstract":"\u003cp\u003e»\u003citalic\u003eAlgorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten\u003c/italic\u003e«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.\u003c/p\u003e","authors":[{"rft.aulast":"Langenohl","rft.aufirst":"Andreas"}],"languages":["eng"],"url":["https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974"],"version":"0.9","x.subjects":["Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded"],"x.labels":["DE-D13","DE-15"],"x.oa":true}
id ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yNzAzMjk3NA
institution DE-D13
DE-15
imprint GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021
imprint_str_mv GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021
issn 0172-6404
issn_str_mv 0172-6404
language English
mega_collection JSTOR Arts & Sciences X Archive
match_str langenohl2021algorithmicreflexivitytheconstitutionofsociotechnicalaccountabilityinfinancialpricing
publishDateSort 2021
publisher GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
recordtype is
record_format is
series Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
source_id 55
title Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_unstemmed Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_full Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_fullStr Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_short Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_sort algorithmic reflexivity : the constitution of socio-technical accountability in financial pricing
topic Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded
url https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974
publishDate 2021
physical 106-125
description <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p>
collection sid-55-col-jstoras10
container_issue 2
container_start_page 106
container_title Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
container_volume 46
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
_version_ 1799366512854695938
geogr_code not assigned
last_indexed 2024-05-18T05:20:26.662Z
geogr_code_person not assigned
openURL url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Algorithmic+Reflexivity+%3A+The+Constitution+of+Socio-Technical+Accountability+in+Financial+Pricing&rft.date=2021-01-01&genre=article&issn=0172-6404&volume=46&issue=2&spage=106&epage=125&pages=106-125&jtitle=Historical+Social+Research+%2F+Historische+Sozialforschung&atitle=Algorithmic+Reflexivity+%3A+The+Constitution+of+Socio-Technical+Accountability+in+Financial+Pricing&aulast=Langenohl&aufirst=Andreas&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng
SOLR
_version_ 1799366512854695938
author Langenohl, Andreas
author_facet Langenohl, Andreas, Langenohl, Andreas
author_sort langenohl, andreas
collection sid-55-col-jstoras10
container_issue 2
container_start_page 106
container_title Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
container_volume 46
description <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p>
facet_avail Online, Free
format ElectronicArticle
format_de105 Article, E-Article
format_de14 Article, E-Article
format_de15 Article, E-Article
format_de520 Article, E-Article
format_de540 Article, E-Article
format_dech1 Article, E-Article
format_ded117 Article, E-Article
format_degla1 E-Article
format_del152 Buch
format_del189 Article, E-Article
format_dezi4 Article
format_dezwi2 Article, E-Article
format_finc Article, E-Article
format_nrw Article, E-Article
geogr_code not assigned
geogr_code_person not assigned
id ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8yNzAzMjk3NA
imprint GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021
imprint_str_mv GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, 2021
institution DE-D13, DE-15
issn 0172-6404
issn_str_mv 0172-6404
language English
last_indexed 2024-05-18T05:20:26.662Z
match_str langenohl2021algorithmicreflexivitytheconstitutionofsociotechnicalaccountabilityinfinancialpricing
mega_collection JSTOR Arts & Sciences X Archive
physical 106-125
publishDate 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
record_format is
recordtype is
series Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
source_id 55
spelling Langenohl, Andreas 0172-6404 GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974 <p>»<italic>Algorithmische Reflexivität: Die Herstellung sozio-technischer Zurechenbarkeit in der Preisbildung auf Finanzmärkten</italic>«. In ethnomethodology (EM), the concept of reflexivity refers to processes of the constitution of meaning through which actors collaboratively produce the interpretations they need in order to orient themselves in various situations. The paper discusses how EM’s constitutive theoretic notion of reflexivity can be applied to non-human agency, referring to approaches in the social studies of finance (SSF) as they are informed by science and technology studies (STS), and in particular, how a reflexive notion of meaning and agency might be applied to financial agency that is largely object-driven, automated, algorithmic, and operates through quantifiers (that is, prices). Filling this gap, the paper outlines how meaning making in largely automated and algorithmic financial markets can be conceptualized in terms of EM’s notion of reflexivity. It thereby refers to recent conceptualization of algorithmic action as a social logic centering on the execution of prescriptions, connects this conceptualization to EM’s notion of accountability, and reconstructs algorithmic finance as a particular distribution of accountability and constitution of reflexivity, among human and non-human financial agencies.</p> Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung
spellingShingle Langenohl, Andreas, Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing, Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded
title Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_full Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_fullStr Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_short Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
title_sort algorithmic reflexivity : the constitution of socio-technical accountability in financial pricing
title_unstemmed Algorithmic Reflexivity : The Constitution of Socio-Technical Accountability in Financial Pricing
topic Special Issue: Positionality Reloaded
url https://www.jstor.org/stable/27032974