Further processing options
Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith
| Journal Title: | Rhetoric Society Quarterly |
|---|---|
| Authors and Corporations: | |
| In: | Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31, 2001, 3, p. 105-117 |
| Type of Resource: | E-Article |
| Language: | English |
| published: |
Rhetoric Society of America
|
| Subjects: |
| finc.format |
ElectronicArticle |
|---|---|
| finc.mega_collection |
sid-55-col-jstoras7 JSTOR Arts & Sciences VII Archive |
| finc.id |
ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8zODg2MDQ1 |
| finc.source_id |
55 |
| ris.type |
EJOUR |
| rft.atitle |
Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith |
| rft.epage |
117 |
| rft.genre |
article |
| rft.issn |
0277-3945 |
| rft.issue |
3 |
| rft.jtitle |
Rhetoric Society Quarterly |
| rft.tpages |
12 |
| rft.pages |
105-117 |
| rft.pub |
Rhetoric Society of America |
| rft.date |
2001-07-01 |
| x.date |
2001-07-01T00:00:00Z |
| rft.spage |
105 |
| rft.volume |
31 |
| abstract |
<p>Balancing the critiques of scientism in communications, this response notes how belletrism has marginalized rhetorical studies on the other side of the modern opposition of the arts and sciences. Such institutional divisions need to be assessed against broader changes in literacy if our disciplinary histories are to be a resource for assessing how rhetoricians in composition and communications can work together. The marginal positions of composition and speech courses may undermine the prestige of rhetoric as an academic discipline, but the margins can be a place of power if approached pragmatically. Looking beyond the pragmatic professionalism of disciplinary insiders such as Stanley Fish, we need to develop alliances with practitioners of the arts of rhetoric outside as well as within the academy if pragmatism is to contribute to the institutional work of making universities into institutions of public learning.</p> |
| authors |
Array
(
[rft.aulast] => Miller
[rft.aufirst] => Thomas
)
|
| languages |
eng |
| url |
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3886045 |
| version |
0.9 |
| x.subjects |
Rhetorical Paths in English and Communication Studies |
| openURL |
url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fvufind.svn.sourceforge.net%3Agenerator&rft.title=Disciplinary+Identifications%2FPublic+Identities%3A+A+Response+to+Mailloux%2C+Leff%2C+and+Keith&rft.date=2001-07-01&genre=article&issn=0277-3945&volume=31&issue=3&spage=105&epage=117&pages=105-117&jtitle=Rhetoric+Society+Quarterly&atitle=Disciplinary+Identifications%2FPublic+Identities%3A+A+Response+to+Mailloux%2C+Leff%2C+and+Keith&aulast=Miller&aufirst=Thomas&rft.language%5B0%5D=eng |
| SOLR | |
| _version_ | 1748599654013992973 |
| access_facet | Electronic Resources |
| author | Miller, Thomas |
| author_facet | Miller, Thomas, Miller, Thomas |
| author_sort | miller, thomas |
| branch_nrw | Electronic Resources |
| collection | sid-55-col-jstoras7 |
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 105 |
| container_title | Rhetoric Society Quarterly |
| container_volume | 31 |
| description | <p>Balancing the critiques of scientism in communications, this response notes how belletrism has marginalized rhetorical studies on the other side of the modern opposition of the arts and sciences. Such institutional divisions need to be assessed against broader changes in literacy if our disciplinary histories are to be a resource for assessing how rhetoricians in composition and communications can work together. The marginal positions of composition and speech courses may undermine the prestige of rhetoric as an academic discipline, but the margins can be a place of power if approached pragmatically. Looking beyond the pragmatic professionalism of disciplinary insiders such as Stanley Fish, we need to develop alliances with practitioners of the arts of rhetoric outside as well as within the academy if pragmatism is to contribute to the institutional work of making universities into institutions of public learning.</p> |
| facet_avail | Online |
| format | ElectronicArticle |
| format_de105 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de14 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de15 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de520 | Article, E-Article |
| format_de540 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dech1 | Article, E-Article |
| format_ded117 | Article, E-Article |
| format_degla1 | E-Article |
| format_del152 | Buch |
| format_del189 | Article, E-Article |
| format_dezi4 | Article |
| format_dezwi2 | Article, E-Article |
| format_finc | Article, E-Article |
| format_nrw | Article, E-Article |
| geogr_code | not assigned |
| geogr_code_person | not assigned |
| id | ai-55-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuanN0b3Iub3JnL3N0YWJsZS8zODg2MDQ1 |
| imprint | Rhetoric Society of America, 2001 |
| imprint_str_mv | Rhetoric Society of America, 2001 |
| institution | DE-15, DE-D13 |
| issn | 0277-3945 |
| issn_str_mv | 0277-3945 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2022-11-04T20:42:59.587Z |
| match_str | miller:2001:disciplinaryidentificationspublicidentitiesaresponsetomaillouxleffandkeith: |
| mega_collection | JSTOR Arts & Sciences VII Archive |
| physical | 105-117 |
| publishDate | 2001 |
| publishDateSort | 2001 |
| publisher | Rhetoric Society of America |
| recordtype | ai |
| score | 18,68584 |
| series | Rhetoric Society Quarterly |
| source_id | 55 |
| spelling | Miller, Thomas 0277-3945 Rhetoric Society of America Rhetorical Paths in English and Communication Studies https://www.jstor.org/stable/3886045 <p>Balancing the critiques of scientism in communications, this response notes how belletrism has marginalized rhetorical studies on the other side of the modern opposition of the arts and sciences. Such institutional divisions need to be assessed against broader changes in literacy if our disciplinary histories are to be a resource for assessing how rhetoricians in composition and communications can work together. The marginal positions of composition and speech courses may undermine the prestige of rhetoric as an academic discipline, but the margins can be a place of power if approached pragmatically. Looking beyond the pragmatic professionalism of disciplinary insiders such as Stanley Fish, we need to develop alliances with practitioners of the arts of rhetoric outside as well as within the academy if pragmatism is to contribute to the institutional work of making universities into institutions of public learning.</p> Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith Rhetoric Society Quarterly |
| spellingShingle | Miller, Thomas, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith, Rhetorical Paths in English and Communication Studies |
| title | Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith |
| title_full | Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith |
| title_fullStr | Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith |
| title_full_unstemmed | Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith |
| title_short | Disciplinary Identifications/Public Identities: A Response to Mailloux, Leff, and Keith |
| title_sort | disciplinary identifications/public identities: a response to mailloux, leff, and keith |
| topic | Rhetorical Paths in English and Communication Studies |
| url | https://www.jstor.org/stable/3886045 |